| Home |
|
ACP Distance 2006 vs 2009 Distance 200 300 400 600 1000 Total BC count - 06 222 93 71 52 10 448 BC dist -06 44400 27900 28400 3120 10000 141900 Canada count -06 50 208 146 107 23 991 Canada dist - 06 101400 62400 58400 64200 23000 309400 BC % of Can.- 06 43.79% 44.71% 48.63% 48.60% 43.48% 45.21% (i.e. BC riders did 45% of Canada's 2006 distance) BC count - 09 263 127 91 59 20 BC dist -09 52600 38100 36400 35400 20000 182500 % BC 09 of 06 118.47% 136.56% 128.17% 113.46% 200.00% 128.61% (i.e. BC Growth, using distance)
PBP Riders 2007 Start Finish BC 41 31 Canada *116 79 BC % 35.34% 39.24% *116 includes 4 HD (HD is something like hors delay. I think it means finished but out side the limit - recognized but and not officially counted.)
Riders/Members - Growth (contraction) Riders Count 2006 166 (85 doing >1 ride) 2009 159 (98 doing >1 ride) 95.78% (i.e. BC's slight contraction, of riders/members)
Cheryl's summary comment: It seems we may need to encourage new riders next year, as well as keep up the mileage. We actually had fewer riders in 09 than 06 (see above), so if we use ridership as a measure of growth to distribute the Canadian PBP quota between clubs we could end up with fewer spots. Assuming we have similar ridership next season.
So more 200s are good, and conflicts with other events are bad.
_